Jean-Paul Akayesu (born ) is a former teacher, school inspector, and Republican . External links. ICTR case documents for Jean Paul Akayesu. Warning: This case deals with topics that are especially grave and may cause trauma invoked by memories of past abuse. If you have. The case arose out of the massacres of perhaps a million Tutsi in Rwanda in Akayesu was mayor.2 A trial chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for.
|Published (Last):||25 April 2014|
|PDF File Size:||17.61 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This stems from the fact that common Article 3 requires a close nexus between violations and the armed conflict. The Chamber considers that it is possible to akayrsu the genocidal intent inherent in a particular act charged from the general context of the perpetration of other culpable acts systematically directed against that same group, whether these acts were committed by the same offender or by others.
Killing members of the group; 2. Threats, intimidation, extortion and other forms of duress which prey on fear or desperation may constitute coercion, and coercion may be inherent in certain circumstances, such as armed conflict. Rwandan nationals were therefore aware, or should have been aware, in that they were amenable to the jurisdiction of Rwandan courts in case of commission of those offences falling caae Article 4 of the Statute.
Based on the foregoing, the Chamber finds there existed at the time of the events alleged in the Indictment an armed conflict not of an international character as covered by Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions. At the beginning ofhe was deployed in Mukoloka, in Shabunda Territory South Kivu Provinceto free the area of the armed group Raiya Mutomboki.
Conclusion The applicability of Common Article 3 and Additional Protocol II has been dealt akaywsu above and findings made thereon in the context of the temporal setting of events alleged in the Indictment.
The Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu
For the first four of these, there is mention only of Common Article 3 as the subject matter jurisdiction of the particular alleged offences, whereas count 15 makes an additional reference to Additional Protocol II. Akayesu’s defence team argued that Akayesu had no part in the killings, and that he had been powerless to stop them.
Hence, the Chamber dismissed the grounds of appeal presented by the Accused para. The ICTR recognised that the central elements of rape could not be captured in the mechanical descriptions of objects and body parts para. Under ground 1, the Accused submitted that he had been denied the right to be defended by counsel of his own choice and to defend himself in person para.
It should be recalled that the four Geneva Conventions, as well as the two Protocols, were adopted primarily to protect the victims, as well as potential victims, of armed conflicts.
Although ICTY Appeals Chamber has, on several occasions, addressed the issue of the interpretation of common Article 3, it should be noted that it has never found it necessary to circumscribe the category of persons who may be prosecuted under Article 3.
The above reference criteria were enunciated as a means of distinguishing genuine armed conflicts from mere acts of banditry or unorganized and short-lived insurrections.
Jean-Paul Akayesu – Wikipedia
Pages within akayfsu section: To accept cookies, click continue. Further, these armed forces must be able to dominate a sufficient part of the territory so as to maintain sustained and concerted military operations and to apply Additional Akaydsu II. Therefore, it directed that the Accused should serve a single sentence of life imprisonment see Judgment and Verdict. This case deals with topics that are especially grave and may cause trauma invoked by memories of past abuse.
ICTR, The Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu
He was a member of the triumvirate, a Extending its solicitude little by little to other categories of war victims, in logical application of its fundamental principle [the Red Cross] pointed the way, first to the revision of the original Convention, and then to the extension of legal protection in turn to prisoners of war and civilians.
These assassinations shattered the peace agreement previously established in the hope of ending armed conflict between the Rwandan Patriotic Front and the Rwandan Government.
Was the Court correct to argue in its conclusion that at the time when Akayesu committed his crimes, Art. Article 3 vase to the Geneva Conventions. Is Protocol II applicable? The Security Council, when delimiting the subject-matter jurisdiction of the ICTR, incorporated violations of international humanitarian law which may be committed in the context of both an international and an internal armed conflict: The Tribunal found that Akayesu facilitated, encouraged, and ordered the commission of these acts.
Sexual violence was a step in the process of destruction of the Tutsi group – destruction of the spirit, of the will to live, and of life itself. The tribunal considered that sexual violence, including rape, need not necessarily manifest itself through a demonstration of physical force.
During the Rwandan genocide of mid, many Tutsis were killed in Akayesu’s commune, and many others were subject to violence and other forms of hatred. At the time the cae occurred, Rwanda was divided administratively into prefectures, which in turn were divided into communes.
Why did the Court find it necessary to establish that Art.
Jean-Paul Akayesu Case | Tackling Violence against Women
As stipulated earlier in this judgment, this implies that Akayesu would incur individual criminal responsibility for his acts if it were proved that by virtue of his authority, he is either responsible for the outbreak of, or is casse directly engaged in the conduct of hostilities.
Progressing human rights — Accessing justice – Transforming equality. Genocide, Crimes against humanity. At least for those rules which are neither incorporated into Rwandan legislation nor self-executing?
In the opinion of xkayesu Appeals Chamber, it does not follow that the perpetrator of a violation of Article 3 must of necessity have a specific link with one of the above-mentioned Parties.