El Gesticulador [Rodolfo Usigli] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Rodolfo Usigli’s El gesticulador is a political commentary in dramatic guise. It is by that token an accusing statement on contemporary Mexican reality, and. El gesticulador is a play about politics and corruption, human relationships, the conflict between truth and lies, reality and appearance, and role-playing in.
|Published (Last):||28 September 2004|
|PDF File Size:||16.5 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.95 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I think that Julia’s character is interesting. I also like how Usigli developed Cesar by introducing his family and their frustration with him on an intimate level. Again, similar to my previous reading of Los de Abajo, this story does not feature a happy ending necessarily, but more importantly concludes with the continuation of corrupt leadership and a false idea of heroism.
Facebook Twitter Email Print. Feb 04, Evelyn rated testiculador liked it.
The repetition of her self-loathing demonstrates the machista attitude in Mexico. There is the poor professor whose name is Cesar Rubio and the hero who died in the war. Jan 26, Ivan T. Another pivotal role is that of Oliver Bolton. I was most interested by the suggestion in the play that one can create an identity, and furthermore a destiny, rooted only in desire. Only Miguel clings to a traditional concept gewticulador the truth.
Fue uno de los mexicanos con mayor sentido de universalidad. Estoy dispuesto a todo para asegurar tu porvenir.
I would even venture gfsticulador say that his role as a US professor is directly related to how the United States tends to be greedy, sticking its nose in other countries’ business. Paperbackpages. Return to Book Page.
Ernie Cordell rated it it was amazing Nov 26, The government cancelled several performances, and writers were hired to severely criticize the performances that were allowed to go on. In the second act one of the most interesting dialogue exchanges is between Estrella and Elena in which Estrella eo to her “What admirable feminine insight!
Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
‘El Gesticulador’ (The Impostor) to be performed in Spanish at Ethnic Cultural Theatre | UW News
During the second act, Julia completely changes her attitude with the prospect of her father being the governor of the state. Apr 28, Jennifer Johnson rated it it was ok. His legacy will live on because of those who believe in it, just like the Mexican Revolution, while appearing to be a failure to some, lived on through those who believed gesticulaodr its purpose. My initial criticism would be that the themes and satire is developed too overtly and that the lack of subtly in the dialogue and the story line take away from the play’s power as a portrayal of the impact of the Mexican Revolution.
As this play was written post-revolution, to me it suggests that Usigili is calling upon the Mexican people and leaders to take responsibility for what happened during the revolution and for their actions.
El Gesticulador allows the reader to q This play is a perfect combination of raw human emotions and a reflection upon a person’s ability to reinvent themselves.
Articles needing additional references from July All articles needing additional references. Yo soy major que muchos de ellos. I can understand why this play was extremely controversial at the time that it was published.
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
I loved this play. I read this with a rather snarky voice in mind which I believe heightens the male dominance portrayed throughout the play. Alexis rated it really liked it Nov 16, Not from audiences who loved it but from politicians who probably saw too much of themselves in it and hired writers to publish scathing reviews.
Quotes from El gesticulador. Generally, Gesticuladoe do not enjoy reading play’s however I for me, this was an enjoyable read and I think that I can attribute it to both the combination of the plot as well as the way that Usigli constructed the play so that felt that it flowed quickly. There, a professor from Harvard University confuses him for a missing revolutionary hero with the same name. But the play has outlived the scandal and is one of Latin America’s best.
I liked the author’s decision to break the play into three parts, each at time intervals four weeks apart, because it allowed for the reader to understand the progression of Cesar’s new role over a span of time. On the surface, there are two Cesar My initial criticism would be that the themes and satire is developed too overtly and that the lack of subtly in the dialogue and the story line take away from the play’s power gfsticulador a portrayal of the impact of the Mexican Revolution.